<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Yes, it&#8217;s you. But only you&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2010/06/11/yes-its-you-but-only-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2010/06/11/yes-its-you-but-only-you/</link>
	<description>Fucked Up Beyond All Recognition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 15:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Constructive Critics Defend Spectators&#8217; Freedom, So Why Do Passive Observers Criticise Them? &#124; Techrights		</title>
		<link>/2010/06/11/yes-its-you-but-only-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Constructive Critics Defend Spectators&#8217; Freedom, So Why Do Passive Observers Criticise Them? &#124; Techrights]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=863#comment-1184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] earlier today we found this rant about the FSF and here is one response to it.  Campaigns like DefectiveByDesign or Windows7Sins are *very*small* things compared to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] earlier today we found this rant about the FSF and here is one response to it.  Campaigns like DefectiveByDesign or Windows7Sins are *very*small* things compared to the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
