<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Procurement &#8211; FU-BAR</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/procurement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/</link>
	<description>Fucked Up Beyond All Recognition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:09:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Letter to DG Int Markt</title>
		<link>/2012/03/20/letter-to-dg-int-markt/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rui Seabra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1384</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Mrs *****, I have to find your answer nothing short of appalling as: a) it says the European Commission considers that it&#8217;s own directive on public procurement is not, to quote your words, a &#8220;common approach on how to deal with those in a consistent matter across all EU member states&#8221;. b) your words &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="/2012/03/20/letter-to-dg-int-markt/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Letter to DG Int Markt"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mrs *****,</p>
<p>I have to find your answer nothing short of appalling as:</p>
<p>a) it says the European Commission considers that it&#8217;s own directive on public procurement is not, to quote your words, a &#8220;common approach on how to deal with those in a consistent matter across all EU member states&#8221;.</p>
<p>b) your words &#8220;the Commission services do not dispose of the expert knowledge required to access technical and complex problems such as those&#8221; I have submitted are probably the most extreme and voluntary admission of incompetence that I have ever had knowledge about as&#8230;</p>
<p>c) there is nothing complex about an extremely clear violation of EU and national law when a public procurement restricts competition in the internal market by explicitly excluding all non Microsoft suppliers by demanding computers with Microsoft Windows.</p>
<p>Thus, I demand to know:</p>
<p>1) what information was given by the Portuguese authorities;</p>
<p>2) documentation on what your services did during all these years regarding this issue and</p>
<p>3) who do I appeal to, as it is evident that DG Internal Market either does not have the know how, or wants to do its job.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Rui Seabra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
