Identi.ca Updates for 2010-12-15

  • Woah! http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-security-announce&m=129237531405260&w=2 #allegation of an #fbi #backdoor in #openbsd #crypto #framework #
  • Hope that a) this is not true or b) it has been cleared, in the meanwhile. #
  • ♺ @robmyers: “Why is WikiLeaks employing a well-known Holocaust denier and his disgraced son?” – http://is.gd/iMHPT #
  • I think that someone is entitled to be an holocaust denialist, although I think that is a very bad/stupid thing to be. (1/2) #
  • (2/2) The real bad thing is that father & son contributed to spreading fake leaks using !wikileaks name. Not their personal beliefs. #
  • RT @jmcesteves RT @jneves: Não comprem os Maias no Kindle – mais cedo ou mais tarde vai ser retirado: http://7sf8.sl.pt #amazoncensors ( … #
  • RT @webmink Latest huge newsletter from Amazon Web Services makes no mention at all of issues arising from Wikileaks: http://wmk.me/eMBRJx #
  • @schestowitz: A result already? #
  • RT @glynmoody RT @evgenymorozov I’m okay with Zuck being the Man of the Year as long as Time accepts my Sissy of the Year award >>well said #
  • RT @schestowitz ♺ @gnuzer #Zuckerberg before #Assange : time.com prefers peoples’ transparency to governments’ transparency http://is.gd#
  • RT @glynmoody Interdiction éventuelle de WikiLeaks : la France décidera “prochainement” [fr] – http://bit.ly/gMtRId careful what you do … #
  • ♺ @telecomix: AT&T Blocks Linux Configuration http://bit.ly/hDrfny “…only pirates use Linux ” #
  • Mispelling “closed” 🙂 great catch ♺ @webmink: @carlopiana Yeah – they wrote “cloud” instead… (but seriously: no mention of FOSS anywhere) #
  • ♺ @jerezim: @FOSSpatents Individuals should be able to attend such events, don’t you think? The EU institutions are sick with lobbying… #
  • ♺ @glynmoody: Avaaz petition: “WikiLeaks: Stop the crackdown” now up to 655K signatures http://bit.ly/dIEl1K only a couple more to a million #
  • More relaxed, #openbsd #fbi #backdoor #allegation denied by named developers: http://bit.ly/ia4ATd #
  • @glynmoody no, just another worsening of censorship laws in Portugal. #
  • Era plantar-lhes uma bomba… #oops! 😉 http://www.publico.pt/Pol%C3%ADtica/aprovada-criminalizacao-do-incitamento-ao-terrorismo_1471153 #
  • @glynmoody my previous statement (in Portuguese) was probably a violation of the law. I don’t know. Hard to tell with #censorship #
  • @glynmoody probably I won’t go to jail, they’d have to prove I really intended to incite others to “set ’em up the bomb” 🙂 #
  • @glynmoody Funny, with the #cybercrime law they didn’t prevent innocent people from commiting a crime by using “with intent” as they did now #
  • @glynmoody YES, #ddos is included in the portuguese terrorism definition (not explicitly though) Law 52/2003 #
  • @remixtures sim, o DDOS pode ser interpretado como um acto terrorista. 2.1.b da http://qlex.intraneia.com/lei/52/2003 #
  • @glynmoody the change is not so bad per se. The real problem is portuguese law 52/2003 which has dangerously vague items. #
  • @glynmoody this law merely added the incitement (with intent). #